Search results

That's a more winning proposition if you're ok with the higher cost for financing. At least you aren't taking the hit on residuals!

Well that just means I'll go to the bank, cut a 20K cheque + tax, pay Kia, and sell it myself and make a good 5-6K. ;)

Looks like this month's interest rates have finally started to come down a little. The 48 month lease has been my target. With 1% less, there is about a 46$ drop. That's still 884$ per month with zero down on 24K annual KM, which is a lot when compared to luxury marques' offers at much higher...

That said, even with a big differential in price, nothing can offset the awful lease rates we are getting and their residual for the car. A 60K Audi A5 Sportback will still cost as much if not less per month. I don't know if Kia will do something about it but putting 900$ CAD a month (4.99% rate...

No problem! I have been very surprised by this and remain astounded by the difference in price. I was expecting 60K CAD for the highest trim before they announced the actual pricing so when I first saw it on the Kia Canada site I was wondering if the marketing folks had screwed up the builder's...

From the quick glance I took it seemed that the trade deal benefited the US more for sales in Korea than contributing to lower duty domestically. Which makes sense because the big 3 would never allow it.

I could only find this for now that seemed to indicate some discounts, however it is on the low side for sure http://openroadautogroup.com/blog/hyundai-vehicles-now-cheaper-thanks-canada-korea-free-trade-agreement It could be a mix of this and what someone here suggested about deeper market...

Hey, sorry to dig up this thread. My friend gave me a plausible reason: Canada has a trade deal with South Korea while the USA doesn't, which is why we get par pricing. It seems to also be the case with VW, which explains how lately their cars seem to price awfully close to USD number-to-number...