derek0609: Here's my take on your six points, thanks for being more clear in your criticism that I asked for. 1. I don't agree that the "red" is over done and feed back so far does not back you up. Then again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That's your view and right to have. 2. I see where you are coming from on the rear lights, I wish they were solid lights like the tail lights. I also wish Kia had not put red plastic there like Dodge did without also making them light up as Dodge did on their's. To do it in a better way would have been too hard if not impossible for me, an indivdual. My lights are in the exact correct location, aren't visible at all in the daytime and were very easy to do. They are at least distinctive to my car even if I have to admit they could blend in better. BTW, they came from O'Rielly's not Pep Boy's. 3. In order to make a "special model" of my GT, I guess I could have just added a nonmatching "R" to the stock GT emblem but that would have been "cheesy" too. You have a point that Nisan does "kinda" own the style or shape of the badge but not the use of the letters gt&r. Don't think that is copyrighted or other brands would be in trouble. Use of the "super bee" under the hood is used in the generic sense (Stinger-get it?) not as a model name. 4. It's "Brushed Aluminum" style not fake CF! Are you against all the many auto manufactures' use of wraps or vinyl instead of more expensive painting? Guess you hate simulated wood also, even when it's very hard to tell the difference. 5. If I wanted muscle car, I would have faced the scoop forward as it was made to be mounted (not backwards). Nor would I have shaved down it's height. It's kinda of a hood bulge now. Took a lot of work to avoid the even more masculine look.
Those are my views, hope I didn't come off as being too blunt, my Mother raised me to be polite to all people.